30–40 non-billable hours, removed per lead
The vetting grind — pulling records, cross-checking programs, sizing the dollars in question — is done before anyone on your team logs in. Associates open a lead, not a blank page.
False Claims Act Intelligence
Fileable False Claims Act leads — already sized, already receipt-backed.
Lexis and CLEAR look up a name you already have. CitiDoge surfaces the name you didn’t know to look for — drawn from public federal spending data, sized in dollars, and traced to public records — eliminating 30–40 non-billable vetting hours before anyone on your team logs in.
Book a 20-minute demo
Built to the DOJ FOCUS four-point bar. Receipt-backed. Leads, never verdicts.
Nationwide, in question
$8.0B
in anomalies in question, nationally
- Flagged leads
- 11,870
- Hours saved / lead
- 30–40
- Medicare
- $7.0B
- EIDL
- $639M
Every figure traces to a public federal record.
The whole idea
Follow the taxpayer dollar.
Wherever public money goes in — Medicare, a small-business loan, a research grant, a nonprofit, a state checkbook — and the outcome, the recipient, or the use doesn’t add up, that’s a lead. One rule, every program.
We don’t need a program’s rulebook to spot money that doesn’t fit. The pattern looks the same whether it’s a hospice or a federal grant — so the net covers all of it.
The Scale, in Public Dollars
$8.0B in anomalies in question — nationally.
11,870 flagged leads in view.
By area
Medicare
$7.0B
11,078 leads
EIDL
$639M
400 leads
Part D
$275M
310 leads
Nonprofit
$144M
64 leads
Hospice
$29M
18 leads
Dollars in question, each traceable to a public record — anomalies, not accusations. Leads, never verdicts.
What it changes for your firm
The most expensive hours in sourcing a case — gone before anyone logs in.
Vetting a lead is the costliest, least billable part of originating a False Claims Act case. CitiDoge does that work first — and ranks by conviction, not by who spent the most — so your team opens an intake that is already sized, already traced to public records, and already worth the partner’s time.
Ranked by conviction, not by size
The queue surfaces the patterns worth a look first — the spending that stands apart from its peers — not simply the biggest line items. The strongest leads rise to the top of the page.
Receipt-backed, ready for the partner's eye
Every figure traces to a public federal record, and each lead is sized in dollars in question. What lands on the partner's desk is an evaluation, not a research project.
The intake, before and after
Sourcing a lead the old way
- Start from a name someone already suspected
- 30–40 non-billable hours pulling and cross-checking records
- Size the exposure by hand before anyone can judge it
- A partner finally looks — often to find it isn't fileable
Sourcing a lead with CitiDoge
- Open a queue ranked by conviction, strongest first
- The dollars in question are already sized
- Every figure already traces to a public record
- The partner evaluates a lead — not a research project
One successful False Claims Act case is seven figures.
Against that, the license is a rounding error — and the hours it returns to your team are billable somewhere else.
Book a 20-minute demo
See the workflow on your firm’s docket in 20 minutes. Leads, never verdicts.
Why you can trust the numbers
A lead only surfaces when the discipline behind it holds up.
The numbers on this page are only as serious as the method that produced them. Ours is built around a single rule — surface a lead when, and only when, the evidence behind it is strong enough to hand to a partner — and measured against the standard the Department of Justice published for the data-miners it wants to work with.
Every lead traces to a public record
Nothing surfaces on assertion. Each figure behind a lead is anchored to a public federal record — the same kind of source a partner would want to cite — so the trail is there before anyone asks for it.
Corroborated across more than one program
A pattern that shows up in a single place is a coincidence. We give weight to the spending in question that lines up across more than one public program — so what reaches the queue is corroborated, not isolated.
More than one independent signal has to agree
A single flag is a hunch, not a lead. A pattern only surfaces when several independent signals point the same way at once — which is what keeps the queue short, sized, and worth a partner's time.
Built to the DOJ “FOCUS” bar
On April 30, 2026 the DOJ Civil Division launched FOCUS to partner with the sophisticated data-miners who now bring more than 45% of qui tam matters. It set out four things it expects from work worth its attention. Our method is built to clear all four.
Analytical rigor
Findings that hold up — with the innocent explanations considered and set aside, not ignored.
Program-rule familiarity
Read in the context of the program's own rules, so a pattern is judged against how the program is meant to work.
Legally-sufficient framing
Shaped so a serious allegation has the substance behind it from the start, not after the fact.
Pre-filing diligence
The vetting done up front — the unglamorous work the standard expects before anything moves forward.
The point of the bar, in the Division’s own framing: file into a tailwind, not against the current.
The reason the queue is short is the reason it’s worth your time: a lead earns its place.
Everything that doesn’t clear the bar stays off the page — so what you open is already worth a partner’s read.
Book a 20-minute demo
The method holds up to scrutiny — see it walked through in 20 minutes. Leads, never verdicts.
The moment, not the pitch
U.S. DOJ Civil Division · April 30, 2026
The government just changed which way the wind blows.
On April 30, 2026, the DOJ Civil Division launched an initiative to partner with the sophisticated data-miners who now bring more than 45% of qui tam cases. The kind of receipt-backed, rigorously-sourced lead that used to be a hard sell is now exactly what the Department asked for.
You would be filing into a tailwind — not against the current.
The bar the initiative set
The Department named four things it expects from a data-led submission. Every lead in CitiDoge is built to meet that bar.
Analytical rigor
A finding that holds up — including the alternative explanations a skeptic would raise.
Program-rule familiarity
Grounded in how the specific federal program is actually supposed to work.
Legally-sufficient allegations
Framed as something that could stand as a properly-pleaded claim, not a hunch.
Pre-filing diligence
The homework done up front, traced to public records, before anyone files.
Leads built to that bar are FOCUS-grade. The moment to bring them is now.
Book a 20-minute demo
See FOCUS-grade leads on your firm’s docket in 20 minutes. Leads, never verdicts.
The one step
See it on your firm’s docket in 20 minutes.
A short, private walkthrough — no account to create, no software to install, and nothing about your matters shared with us. You will see how receipt-backed leads are surfaced and prioritized, and decide for yourself whether it earns a place in your origination workflow.
No pressure, no pitch deck
A working walkthrough of real, receipt-backed leads — you drive, we answer questions.
Your matters stay yours
We never ask about your cases. The walkthrough uses public-record leads, not your data.
Built for the FOCUS bar
Every lead traces to a public record and is built to meet the Department's four-point standard.